Stuart Waterstone Forum Index Stuart Waterstone

 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

The way ****40 Should have appeared.

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Stuart Waterstone Forum Index -> Questions
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Waterstone
Site Admin


Joined: 31 Jan 2005
Posts: 163

PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2018 6:36 pm    Post subject: The way ****40 Should have appeared. Reply with quote

****40. Dwain, an 17-year-old minor, lived w/his widowed mother in Chatsworth, Ca. Violet. After numerous arguments regarding people he associated with, Dwain and his mother agreed he should move out and support himself. Dwain took his personal belongings; moved to San Francisco, he received no further support from his mother. While living in S.F. he was shot and taken to the hospital for treatment. He remained hospitalized for two weeks. Hospital sought payment from Violet. She refused, the hospital turned the matter over to a collection agency who brought action against Violet. Is Violet liable for her son's medical expenses? If she cannot pay, or flatly refuses to pay, who if anyone will pay?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Stuart Waterstone Forum Index -> Questions All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group